Can science and religion meet; embracing each other like a soulmate, unveiling depths within one another?
For years, we are used to seeing debates instead of duet between science and religion, to the point that we believe the two can’t co-exist. Right now, The growing belief is that religion doesn’t have scientific foundation, whereas science can exist without religion. In reality, the groundbreaking theoretical physic, the Big Bang, was proposed by a Jesuit, while algebra, the very foundation of mathematic calculations, was written out by a Muslim scientist.
Today, we divide science and religion like two conflicting poles and reluctant to find the resonance between the two. But who would guess that the Vatican has a long standing interest in astronomy and invests time, money, and resources into the studies of the stars, to this day?
In fact, underneath their universe-gazing dome is mundane scientific learnings that might not be glamorous (like, alien-spotting), but provide the substance to many other scientific researches. “We didn’t find cutting-edge technologies, but our findings are the foundations for the next discoveries,” said Guy Consolmagno, the Director of Vatican Observatory.
Having lived as both priests and scientists, the Vatican astronomers wholly believe that the duet between the two, of reasons and of faith, is what pulling these two opposites into enriching and ennobling dialogues. The humility of faith, which is the engine for any religious people, also lies at the heart of any scientific inquiries because science, too, does not begin with logic, but with intuition.
You have to take that leap. And that’s the same way in pursuing a scientific theory. That when you have a great idea you don’t know if after two years you’re going to realize, “Boy, did I make a mistake. I just wasted two years chasing down the wrong path.” Though it’s never totally a waste. Certainly you could guess wrong, you could guess right. And we all do. So it’s this marvelous interplay between our intuition and then our logic, and that’s why it’s such a human experience. It’s something you could never program a computer to do.
But how does this search for Truth sit in the intersection of science and religion?
While searching a more meaningful career path, Guy Consolmagno went to Kenya to teach astronomy. Once, he took out his telescope and showed them the rings of Saturns and the craters on the moon that was soon responded with explosive joys from the students.
Then I remembered this thing the Jesuits had taught me, “You don’t live by bread alone.” Right? You have to have something else feeding you. If you’re a human being, you have to have a reason why you’re eating the bread. You have to have a meaning for your life and part of it is to develop the sense of awe, the sense of wonder, the sense of joy at looking at the sky.
Sadly, the entertainment media, the likes of Bill Maher (who really is more of a TV personality than an actual atheist), has enjoyed results (that is, making money) from putting science and religion into mindless and endless debate. Krista Tippett, too, lamented in her book Einstein’s God:
The science-religion “debate” is unwinnable, and it has led us astray. To insist that science and religion speak the same language, or draw the same conclusions, is to miss the point of both of these pursuits of cohesive knowledge and underlying truth. To create a competition between them, in terms of relevance or rightness, is self-defeating.
What’s meaningful is often found in the intersection between two seemingly opposite poles, when the two come at an agreement, creating a new kind of language and understanding. Perhaps performing science without humility and a sense of responsibility, too, is an abjection to human’s progress (such as this, where science is more stylish than ennobling). And performing religion without proper grounding to our visceral reality is a blind faith.
Why the science-religion debate still exists, often in a way that diminish the two, is beyond me. Perhaps, partly is our impulsive response to defend our belief and partly, a generational thing where the trivial; the entertainment, overrules substance.